Atomic Governance

Morpheus is unique in many aspects and governance is no exception. Morpheus is unique in many ways, and governance is no exception. To maintain an unprecedented pace of development and streamline decision-making related to software, infrastructure, capital, compute, and frontends, Morpheus has adopted the Atomic Governance model. This model allows every individual involved to freely associate and make independent decisions about their contributions, without the need for votes or friction being introduced.

For example, at the community level, Morpheus repository maintainers can decide whether or not to merge open-source contributions from Coders, based on the value of the contribution and the reward the contributor expects. Compute providers choose which AI models they want to support and at what price. Meanwhile, MOR holders decide which projects to back by staking MOR, directing rewards to Builders based on their interest in the software being developed. At the protocol level, Atomic Governance diverges from typical Web3 governance models like DAOs. Here’s how it works:

Proposals are made by the community, followed by general discussion.
Repository owners identify individuals with the relevant expertise and involve them in the technical design and planning process.
Once the best technical design is identified and developers confirm they can implement and test it within a reasonable timeframe, work begins.
The broader coding community is welcome to contribute by submitting issues, pull requests, and other contributions.
No broad voting on the proposal, design, or code is required. Decisions are based on expert consensus, with the final judgment made by the repository owner.
After the code is developed and deployed every user maintains the right to use or not use it. To fork the code and otherwise create a different version or opt out of the project.

This approach to governance is aligned with a , allowing for rapid development without the delays and complexities of trying to build consensus among large groups. It’s especially advantageous where quick iterations and adjustments are crucial to achieving product-market fit and adapting to evolving market conditions.

Last updated 8 months ago

Was this helpful?

Proposals are made by the community, followed by general discussion.
Repository owners identify individuals with the relevant expertise and involve them in the technical design and planning process.
Once the best technical design is identified and developers confirm they can implement and test it within a reasonable timeframe, work begins.
The broader coding community is welcome to contribute by submitting issues, pull requests, and other contributions.
No broad voting on the proposal, design, or code is required. Decisions are based on expert consensus, with the final judgment made by the repository owner.
After the code is developed and deployed every user maintains the right to use or not use it. To fork the code and otherwise create a different version or opt out of the project.